01 December 2017

Fantasy Land: Dreams of Glory

I have no inside info, but if you wanna know what COULD happen, let's assume:

1. Trump had instructed Flynn to lie to the FBI about speaking to Kislyak, 

2. Flynn, to avoid jail for himself and maybe his son too, spills those beans to Mueller,

4. Mueller not only believes it, he has some corroborating evidence it's true, and,

4. Kushner, the boy genius who urged Trump to fire Comey, (which, of course, begot Mueller) had actually encouraged his father-in-law to so instruct Flynn because it was Kushner who told Flynn to speak to Kislyak in the first place.

5. Result: Trump and Kush are in the shitter, and they negotiate a deal. Terms: Trump resigns, Kushner pleads nolo to a Logan Act violation and gets a suspended sentence, and they are each free thereafter to make bullshit statements that this is all a "deep state" lynching, blah, blah, blah. 

How many lawyers out there have experience negotiating a resignation plea deal for an Article II Officer? To accomplish this, I would consider coming out of retirement, as long as it doesn't interfere with striped bass fishing

Have a nice day.

30 November 2017

Trump, Redux, (and redux, and redux, and redux, etc.)

Been busy, so I haven't written lately. But I still read, and heartily recommend several short essays I picked up this morning from David Leonhardt's column in the failing New York Times. 
Leonhardt wrote a small piece about Trump,  https://nyti.ms/2BBh8Ef
 but, more importantly, referred to a series of short articles in Vox, a site I had never before visited. Reading will take you only five minutes. Warning: Do not read while operating heavy machinery because of the risk a sudden onset of stomach cramps. 

The articles lay out the conundrum brilliantly, in plain language, and were written before the President's misleading "Muslim attack" tweets and his extraordinary insulting riposte to the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.

Take a look: (If clicking on this does not work, copy and paste into the url box at the top of your screen. If you don't know how to do that, ... .)


And it's ok to start drinking early today.

A bientot.

11 November 2017


In an earlier blog, I hypothesized Roy Moore sitting in the United States Senate, or worse, joining up with the Supremes.

Well, I guess we no longer need to worry about a U.S. Supreme Court Justice Moore now. Even if appointed, he likely would not clear the Senate despite the fact that his criminal behavior was not much worse than Trump's, who, so far as we know, limited his assaults to adults.

I admit it's kinda fun watching the result of the Moore molestation story:  doncha love seeing our national Republican leaders frantically scurrying about looking for a hole in the baseboard?  Most are following the lead of the courageous moralist Mitch McConnell, and using the mushmouth approach "Well, if Moore did it, then he should quit." Sad. But think about it, in a way it's an improvement.  Did you hear McConnell & Company say, "Well if Trump did it, he should quit?"

So is this an improvement, at least on the national level?

Nah, on second thought, of course they couldn't say that because while Moore denies his crime, Trump admitted his!

On the state level, fuhgeddiboudit. That's a whole different game. The good ol' boys don't even bother with "if." They know in their gut the story is true, and they cut right to core of the report. One Alabama state office holder said, "No problem, Joseph dated a teenager named Mary, and look how well that turned out!" Another said "Big deal, Moore was in his thirties, and he liked 14-yr-old girls. What's wrong with that? This is Alabama, baby!"

Moore, however, didn't listen to the advice credited to the hated Great Emancipator who counseled that a man who defends himself has a fool for a client. Moore insisted he i) he didn't know the dyed-in-the-wool Republican woman who has given a detailed account about how, when she was 14 yrs. old, Moore took her to his cabin in the woods and stripped her naked, but he ii) admitted that in his thirties, he did indeed, have a thing for 14 yr. old girls, but always checked in with the mommas before he took their daughters to his lair and undressed them. Or something like that.

Two points, and then I gotta go because we're in St. Barths and Cleo arrives in ten minutes for my massage. And yes, Cleo is over 14.

Point I.  Does this revelation mean Alabamans will now dismiss Judge Roy Moore's assurances that 9/11 and Sandy Hook were the result of our lack of belief in Jesus?

Point II. Hypothetically, if, as part of the 1865 surrender terms, we had coerced Alabama to ban slavery forever, should we not have then insisted that Alabama remain outside the Union?

Who are these people?

A bientot.

04 November 2017

Follow-up on Manafort Man-up

Last week I noted a piece I wrote for Time.com.  This week I report that a condensed version has been published in the print edition marked November 13. With a little luck, and some cursing, I will push my technical skills to the wall reproduce the images here:

Ta Dah!

A bientot.

31 October 2017

Manafort Will Man Up

There is nothing in the Manafort indictment about collusion with Russia in the 2016 campaign. So what's the real significance of the Manafort indictment?  For one answer, just read the scores of articles in today's press, print and digital. They all say the same thing: the pressure on Manafort will force him to fold and ultimately give evidence against Trump.  But the commentators underestimate this President.  And Time.com thought enough of my different take on this development to publish the note I wrote on this subject yesterday. 

Check it out:


A bientot.

17 October 2017

Unrefrigerated fish?

Okay, I am a cynic. Blame it on the tidal wave of contrived news, lies, and fakery coming out of our government lately. So if the following report seems like I have finally gone around the bend, have pity. Anyway, here's my take on a story in the news. (No, not Harvey Weinstein. Another story.)

A couple backpacking through a Taliban controlled area of Afghanistan while she is "heavily pregnant." Hmm. Hubby was formerly married to a woman who applauded the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11, and whose family was buddies with Osama bin Laden. Double hmmmm. Then the Boyle couple is "kidnapped" by the Taliban and get to live "in captivity" in Taliban-controlled territory, as a family, for five years, where they raise three healthy-looking children and lose a fourth in childbirth. After their remarkable rescue (I'm getting to that, I promise!) hubby tells the press that he and his wife decided to have children even while held captive because they always planned to have a big family and decided, "Hey, let's make the best of this and at least go home with a larger start on our dream family."

Your nose twitching yet? There's more.

When the Afghan government captured a Taliban commander, and sentenced him to death, the Boyle captors threatened to kill the the entire family unless the convicted Taliban commander were freed. No surprise, a chubby-cheeked Mrs. Boyle then appeared in a video in which she urged the Afghans to "Just give her captors something," and an equally well-fed Mr. Boyle chimed in, "They will not settle this until they get what they are demanding." The NY Times, in the understatement of the year, wrote "The motivation behind the release of the video, and the timing, remain unclear." 

​Now for the denouement: last week, the Pakistani military proudly announced that

i) working with US intelligence sources, they recently discovered the entire Boyle family was being moved, all five of them crammed into the back seat of an automobile, then

ii) the Pakistani soldiers surrounded the car, then

iii) the tires of the vehicle were blown out in the ensuing firefight, then

​iv) ​the captors shouted, "kill the hostages," but

v)​ the hostages were nevertheless miraculously saved unharmed, and

​vi) the bad guys "fled on foot," also apparently unharmed.

(Mr. Boyle, in a post-release press conference, said the commendable Pakistani military "got between the car and the criminals to make sure the prisoners were safe and that my family was safe.'' How they could do that with the bad guys in the front seat and the the entire family in the back seat of the vehicle was not explained.)


After the family is rescued and transported to the U.S. embassy in Islamabad (she is an American citizen, he is Canadian), hubby announces that despite the key role the United States played in his liberation, he refuses to be transported to our shores as a matter of principle. Arrangements are then made to take them to Canada, and President Trump announces, ​“This is a positive moment for our country’s relationship with Pakistan.''

Why does this tale bring to mind the films, "Wag The Dog," and "Argo?"

Question: If they put this ​story up on the silver screen, would the audience,

a) applaud, or 
b)​ hold their noses while booing​, and escape the theatre unharmed?

A  bientot.

07 October 2017

Oh yeah, one more bit of news:

Not about Donald. About me!

Headline:  "Marty London Interviewed on “Conversations in the Digital Age” With Jim Zirin"

I just appeared on CUNY TV show “Conversations in the Digital Age” with host Jim Zirin. In the half-hour interview, I was asked about my book, The Client Decides, and my 50 years at the Bar.  I talked about my nationally prominent clients: two United States Vice Presidents, Jacqueline Onassis, and Rick Fischbein who, with a little help from me, trounced Donald Trump.  

The show will air on CUNY TV in accordance with the following schedule beginning on October 9:

  • Monday, October 9 - 9:30 p.m.
  • Wednesday, October 11 - 11:00 p.m.
  • Saturday, October 14 - 5:00 p.m.
  • Sunday, October 15 - 11:30 a.m.
  • Monday, October 16 - 8:30am2:30 p.m.

CUNY TV is cablecast in New York City on Ch. 75 (Time Warner and Cablevision), Ch. 77 RCN, and Ch. 30 (Verizon FIOS). 

The show will also be posted on WNET Passport, and will be available on the CUNY TV website, YouTube, and website www.digitalage.org.

» Watch the YouTube video

A bientot.

05 October 2017

Handmaid's Tale redux?

Recent correspondence with a Trumpian friend led me to take my crystal ball -- she insists on being called Futura -- out of the closet and dust it off. Though not the latest 2017 model, she still had some modern artificial intelligence improvements: speech, predictive algorithms, and a split screen option that displayed two possible future scenarios.

Scenario I  

Futura said that obviously Mueller's Russia investigation is looking deep into the White House, up to and including the President. Bannon was right: firing Comey was a colossal mistake, which, taken together with President's own statements, has created a strong inference that Trump's motive was to obstruct the FBI's Russia inquiry. Add in the scores of misleading filings by Jared Kushner re his Russia meetings, the misleading statements by Donald Junior regarding that now-crowded meeting with representatives of the Putin's government, (the statement Junior offered up to Congress was reportedly drafted and/or approved by Senior,) the evident misdeeds of Trump associates like Manafort, Flynn, et al, and the vise tightens. 

Futie pointed out that each week had brought another turn of the screw. The no-knock search warrant of Manafort's home told us that for sure Mueller believed a crime has been committed.  Mueller's inquiry into the White House documents revealed the direction (or at least one of them) of the prosecutor's attack.  And the recent overheard conversation that the White House counsel may be hiding some documents from Mueller adds drive to the assault on the President.

I asked her how much pressure Trump could take before he fires Mueller.

Futie pointed out that this president does not have a great track record of stability. He is vain and impulsive. So on screen One, she projects that, ignoring the advice of his advisers, Trump will fire Mueller along with anybody else who threatens him. What will the Congress do? Futura predicted the craven Republican House likely would not impeach. But if they did, she said,Trump would quit in a huff before the Senate ever got to vote, and we would get Pence.


The second scenario projects that by 2020, Trump has so far withstood a not-yet-completed Mueller inquiry (it took three and half years before they got the goods on Nixon), and so in June of that year, the president does the following:

 i) appears on Fox and Family and declares himself "The Greatest President Of All Time,"

 ii) follows this up with a series of victory-lap rallies where his partisans hysterically chant, "Four More and Then the Wall,"

iii) pardons all his former campaign chairs, cabinet members, children, in-laws, and Putin's mishpoche, and 

iv) tweets that The Donald is ending the run of this Reality Show while it is still Number One in the ratings. He is retiring.

Futura then shows the Pence/Cruz ticket winning an electoral college victory over the Dem's Biden/Bernie ticket, despite a six million popular vote deficit. (This fantasy is not so fantastic. We have a growing problem not contemplated by the Founders, who did not plan on party politics and current population shifts towards the cities. Today, 70 percent of the population elects 30 percent of the Senate. Gerrymandering and population shifts lock in a House Republican majority despite a substantial Democratic popular vote victory. It happened in 2016 and will happen again in 2020.) 

In both scenarios, with Pence at the big desk in the oval office, the Gorsuch nomination begins to look like it is the result of a left-wing conspiracy. The president's next confirmed appointments to the Supreme Court are disciples of Judge Roy Moore, and perhaps Senator Moore himself. The result is a kind of Handmaid's Tale redux: Pence's Indiana ban on Planned Parenthood goes national, and is OK'd by the Supremes. Wade, Griswold, Windsor, Obergefell, and Lawrence are reversed, with the result that states are again free to ban abortions and criminalize the use of contraceptives (even by married couples) as Connecticut did until its statute was struck down by the Court in 1965. The states will also be free to ban same-sex marriage and once again make consensual homosexual conduct a felony. The result is the Court effectively amends the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of Constitution so that certain religious views trump the Bill of Rights.

When my elbow accidentally nudged Futura to the edge of the table, I did not try to stop its crash to the floor, and quickly took the smoking fragments out to the curbside trash bin.

Remember the days when the biggest argument against impeaching Nixon was that Agnew was Vice President? The smart guys figured it out, got rid of Agnew, and then got rid of Nixon. What we need now is more smart guys.  We need a Pence scandal. Something big. Bigger even than Pence getting caught lunching with a woman when his wife was not present.


N.B.  I drafted this piece two weeks ago and put it aside.  I wondered if the "Handmaid's Tale" reference was a bit over the top. But a couple of days ago, I went back to my draft after reading a frightening item in the NYTimes. It reported on the nomination of a law professor, Amy Coney Barrett, to a seat on the Seventh Circuit, and noted she was "often mentioned as a potential candidate for the high court, especially if Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg were to retire."

Though the candidate did not reveal it on the questionnaire she submitted to the Senate, she is a member of "small, tightly knit Christian group called 'People of Praise.'" There are 1,800 members in the world. The article continues:

Some of the group’s practises would surprise many faithful Catholics. Members of the group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty, called a covenant, to one another, and are assigned and are accountable to a personal adviser, called a “head” for men and a “handmaid” for women. The group teaches that husbands are the heads of their wives and should take authority over the family... .
The group believes in prophecy, speaking in tongues and divine healings ... .
If, at this point, you need to lie down for a bit, please do so. Only after you recover should you consider reading the entire article. You will probably then need to lie down again. Or have a double scotch. Or both. Here it is:


Me, I'm going out to the trash and see if I can repair Futura and apologize to her.

ontinue reading the main story